Peter Glidden, BS, ND is a naturopath who describes himself as follows: “I am an outspoken, steadfast stand for the health of people worldwide. I am an unruffled, proud pioneer of wholistic naturopathic medicine, delivering the touch-stone message, so very necessary in this time of unparalleled human suffering, of health recovery through science based, clinically verified wholistic medicine to anyone with the ears to hear it. ” (1)
You might also call him a superhero for speaking out. In an interview (link below), he talks about the business of medicine, beginning with reference to a 12-year meta-analysis of chemotherapy treatment published in The Journal of Clinical Oncology that determined that 97% of the time, chemo does not work.
Hardin Jones, MD was a former professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California at Berkeley. He studied cancer for well over twenty years and came to this conclusion:
“My studies have proven conclusively that untreated cancer victims actually live up to four times longer than treated individuals. For a typical type of cancer, people who refused treatment lived for an average of 12 1/2 years. Those who accepted surgery and other kinds of treatment lived an average of only three years! Beyond a shadow of a doubt, radical surgery on cancer patients does more harm than good.” (2, 3)
Regardless of what we know about the causes of cancers and natural ways to prevent and treat them, the conventional treatment regimen in North America maintained by medical doctors and the medical establishment employs chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery.
Chemo does not work, it makes people sicker and can actually cause other serious illness—including other cancer, Dr. Jones asserts. He is neither alone in this assertion nor is it unfounded.
The cancer studies you don’t hear about are those that show time and again that chemotherapy doesn’t work. (4)
Another meta-analysis published in The Journal of Clinical Oncology entitled “Twenty-two years of phase III trials for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: sobering results” concluded:
“Analysis of past trials in North America shows that the prolongation in median survival between two arms of a randomized study was rarely in excess of 2 months.” (5)
This means that from 1973 to 1994, North American research into the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer showed a median extension in survival rate of TWO MONTHS compared with those who didn’t undergo the chemical treatments.
The summary of a 1992 study published in Biomed & Pharmacother by Dr. Ulrich Abel of the Institut für Epidemiologic und Biometrie in Heidelberg, Germany reads:
“This article is a short version of a report which presents a comprehensive analysis of clinical trials and publications examining the value of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced epithelial cancer…Apart from lung cancer, in particular small-cell lung cancer, there is no direct evidence that chemotherapy prolongs survival in patients with advanced carcinoma. Except for ovarian cancer, available indirect evidence rather supports the absence of a positive effect.[emphasis added] In treatment of lung cancer and ovarian cancer, the therapeutical benefit is at best rather small, and a less aggressive treatment seems to be at least as effective as the usual one.” (6)
A 2011 Belgian study on the long-term effects of chemotherapy on breast cancer found:
“…there is insufficient information regarding the long-term sequelae of most chemotherapeutic agents. In this review, we describe different potential long-term adverse events associated with adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer, with a particular focus on long-term cardiac toxicity, secondary leukemia, cognitive function, and neurotoxicity…In addition, we discuss the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on fertility and sexual function of young breast cancer patients…The fact that adjuvant chemotherapy is often given to patients who might not really need it [emphasis added] urges us to consider the whole spectrum of chemotherapy risks versus benefits to maximize benefit without compromising quality of life.” (7)
Can you say “fraud”?
When asked why chemotherapy is the chosen mode of cancer treatment if it doesn’t work, Dr. Glidden explained what only MDs (and not their patients) would know: when a doctor prescribes chemotherapy, s/he pays $5,000 to the drug company for the supplies and charges the patient $12,000. The insurance company reimburses $9,000. The doctor pockets the difference. “It’s about money.”
Indeed. Healthcare spending in the United States far exceeds that of other First World nations, yet its citizens are no healthier—on the contrary. The spending isn’t on doctor visits and hospital admissions but from the use of medical technologies and pharmaceuticals; in addition, the per-use cost of most medical resources is higher than in most other countries. (8)
Chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer is not only recommended, it is foisted upon us.
“Medicine in the United States is a for-profit industry…most people bow down to the altar of MD-directed high-tech medicine at their own demise.”
- Fish Oils Save Young Accident Victims from Permanent Brain Damage
Every once in a great while, mainstream doctors look away from their “standard of care” medical bags and dare to …
- How Your Smartphone Light Affects Your Brain And Body (Infographic)
Your smartphone screen produces a blue light to make it easy to use in bright and dark environments. However, at …
- 6 Unwanted Symptoms of Low Testosterone
Testosterone is one of the most important hormones for men. Testosterone levels help regulate everything from sex drive and mood …
- Scientists In Amsterdam Just Destroyed Breast Cancer Tumors In 11 Days Without Chemo
For many women, breast cancer may seem like a death sentence. But scientists in Europe may have found a new …
- Popular Prescription Medications May Contribute to Falls, Injuries in Elderly Patients
Too often we hear of elderly people falling and breaking a hip or becoming very bruised, limiting mobility and having …
- Why Homemade Sauerkraut Could Be Your Secret Weapon Against Fat, Cancer And Heart Disease
When it comes to probiotics, most people think of pills or yogurt, but there are many other foods that have …
- New ‘Foolproof’ Test to Detect ADHD Fails To Live Up to Its Claim and Here’s Why.
Eight to ten percent of school-age children are currently diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). It is a behavioral …
- This Ancient Detox Juice Fights Cancer And Promotes The Regeneration of New Healthy Cells
Although store-bought orange juice is a breakfast staple, it’s been criticized a lot lately for it’s high sugar content. However, …
- Molecular Biologist Explains How THC Kills Cancer Completely
From Compultense University in Madrid, Spain, Dr. Christina Sanchez has been studying the anti-tumor effects of THC, the main psychoactive …
- Beating Brain Tumors With a Scorpion Sting Paint
Brain surgery is perhaps the most delicate of intrusive surgical procedures. The brain, for the most part, all looks alike–unlike …
- Clear Your Lungs And Sinuses In 30 Minutes With These Homemade Shower Disks
No one likes feeling sick. Having a sore throat, puffy eyes, and a stuffy nose is a recipe for sleepless …
- Talcum Powder Is Linked To Cancer And Lung Damage
You would think that baby products are made to be as non-toxic as possible, but studies have shown that an …
- Breastfeeding Boosts Your Baby’s Immune System And Lowers Your Risk of Ovarian And Breast Cancer
Breastfeeding isn’t easy for most new mothers, but science is suggesting that it’s a struggle worth pushing through. When it …
- New Device Plugs Gunshot Wounds Within Seconds
The average adult has about five liters of blood, depending on size and weight. Gunshot wounds can cause a person …
- The EXACT Amount Of Calcium Your Body Needs Depending On Your Age
By now, you’ve probably seen enough yogurt and almond advertisements to know that calcium has become a strong selling point. …